The Art and Science of DC Plan Investment Design

Since their emergence within the Seventies, outlined contribution (DC) plans in the USA have developed. One notable change has been a shift in how they develop funding lineups for participant-directed DC plans. Plan sponsors are progressing from merely utilizing generally held funding beliefs to making a construction that deliberately considers the traits and desires of their distinctive group of contributors.

On this article, I define the method for creating such a construction from an asset class perspective. A key element to considerate DC plan funding design is crafting a diversified funding construction earlier than choosing particular funding automobiles.

Regulatory Basis & Steering for Funding Menu Construction

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) mandates that plan fiduciaries act prudently and diversify the plan’s investments to attenuate the chance of huge losses. By offering a larger diploma of asset class diversification, plan sponsors can allow extra alternatives for contributors who self-direct their retirement account to mitigate funding danger.

For DC plans topic to ERISA, there are a number of prescriptive necessities, together with a principles-based normal of care (responsibility of loyalty and responsibility of care) that plan fiduciaries should observe when constructing a plan’s funding construction. Even for plans not topic to ERISA, many plan sponsors contemplate the rules set forth underneath ERISA as greatest follow and select to implement them.

Typically, ERISA part 404(c) supplies DC plan fiduciaries safety from the legal responsibility for participant funding selections if they provide a minimal of three diversified funding choices that bear materially completely different danger and return traits, corresponding to fairness, fastened revenue, and money equivalents.

In follow, it’s fairly uncommon for an funding construction to be restricted to only three funding choices. It is because many funding fiduciaries consider that providing a bigger, diversified alternative set is helpful for contributors. Beneath the Pension Safety Act of 2006, sure pre-diversified funding choices, corresponding to Goal Date Funds (TDFs), are thought-about certified default funding alternate options (QDIA), which supplies a protected harbor to mitigate fiduciary danger.

The US Division of Labor (DOL) supplies steerage for the number of TDFs in addition to periodic critiques of continued suitability. The DOL steerage is greatest follow and plan sponsors ought to leverage it when evaluating TDF utilization of their plan’s funding construction. Plan sponsors ought to set up a structured course of that first identifies a TDF philosophy after which critiques participant demographic information, together with retirees, to evaluate and finally choose an acceptable TDF suite. The identical participant information evaluate can also be helpful when assessing a plan’s core funding construction.

Past ERISA necessities and elective protected harbor provisions, DC plans’ named funding fiduciaries and their 3(21) funding advisors and three(38) funding managers have wide-ranging funding construction flexibility if choices are made in the very best curiosity of contributors and beneficiaries. Such flexibility permits for an array of appropriate funding choices, which might be overwhelming for plan sponsors.

Crafting a Strong Funding Construction

Whereas the variability of DC plan participant teams’ wants and traits precludes a set components of a “proper” or “improper” funding lineup design course of, plan sponsors ought to preserve a prudent and documented choice course of to fulfill their fiduciary obligations underneath ERISA.

A complete design course of is multi-step, calls for engagement by a plan sponsor’s retirement plan committee, and is greatest led by a professional retirement plan advisor who’s dedicated to facilitating committee conversations and getting ready demographic and fund utilization critiques, amongst different duties.

A Pattern Course of in Seven Steps

1. Determine a objective & aims assertion

Determine the corporate’s philosophy in regards to the DC plan’s main objective and aims. Pattern statements and their potential affect on funding construction:

Goal: It is necessary that our DC plan mirror the corporate’s aim to advertise a tradition of “retirement surroundings.” This may manifest as: lengthy worker tenure, workers who generally retire from our firm, and retirees who discover it enticing to retain their DC plan accounts within the employer’s plan all through retirement.

Potential affect: The aim assertion may recommend that plan asset courses and TDFs assist a retiree’s have to diversify fastened revenue allocations, as a result of fastened revenue usually turns into a bigger portion of an investor’s portfolio close to all through retirement.

Goal: It is necessary that our DC plan additional the corporate’s aim of supporting workers as they save and make investments for retirement. We observe that our firm has a protracted historical past of using principally early-career individuals, and based mostly on previous expertise, we count on excessive worker turnover that ends in few, if any, retirements from the corporate. When retirements happen, we observe that accounts are faraway from the DC plan shortly thereafter.

Potential affect: The aim assertion may advantage the inclusion of a number of fairness asset courses and core or core plus fastened revenue as a result of, for the non-TDF investor phase, this design would offer for ample fairness diversification, whereas minimizing the necessity to allocate to separate fastened revenue sub-asset courses. It additionally may lend itself to a TDF designed for prime fairness allocations early in its glide path and low-to-moderate fairness allocations (relative to the TDF universe common) close to the goal retirement age.

2. What % of contributors are enrolled in managed account providers and/or self-directed brokerage accounts?

Participant enrollment in a managed account service is often low sufficient that it doesn’t affect the plan’s general funding construction, other than guaranteeing the service’s minimal required asset courses are included. But when the managed account service serves because the plan’s QDIA, and retention within the QDIA is excessive, determine the asset courses the managed account supplier will use and never use. Carry out a cost-benefit evaluation of together with asset courses past these required by the managed service supplier.

3. Develop a participant group profile to grasp the plan’s traders.

A DC plan’s participant group profile needs to be based mostly on demographics and investor kind. Since every plan’s participant group has various demographic traits, don’t depend on participant group averages for data corresponding to age, compensation, schooling degree, and firm tenure. Analyzing averages usually fails to mirror the breadth of a plan’s distinctive participant group, in addition to any concentrated segments that signify the biggest variety of contributors.

When growing the participant group profile, consider what greatest describes the largest variety of contributors. Plan sponsors might divide contributors into the next classes:

a. Investor kind

• The “do it for me” kind: Individuals who elect to put money into the QDIA; any fund with broad asset allocation, corresponding to goal danger or different asset allocation funds; or a managed account service.
• The “do it myself” kind: Individuals who elect to take a position principally in particular person asset class funds or a self-directed brokerage account.

If “do it for me” is the plan’s predominant investor kind, the funding construction might or might not have to comprise greater than the first asset courses relying on the profile of the “do it myself” traders. For instance, if the “do it myself” traders have a excessive degree of funding proficiency or are prone to have their very own private funding advisors, the funding construction could also be justifiably extra complete. Nonetheless, relying on the traits and variety of the “do it myself” traders, advert hoc requests from contributors for particular sub-asset class choices and different funding automobiles could also be greatest addressed by providing a self-directed brokerage possibility.

b. Demographic profile

• Determine the quantity and % of contributors by age vary and investor kind.
• Search for any prevalent age cohorts. Understanding the focus in every age cohort can sign consideration for particular wants.

c. Funding proficiency of non-QDIA traders

• Rank the committee’s notion of participant funding proficiency as excessive, medium, or low. Funding proficiency might be estimated based mostly on how effectively the “do it myself” group makes use of non-QDIA asset courses. For instance, is there a sample of choosing few asset courses, and does the sample fluctuate by age cohort?
• It’s cheap to count on early-career contributors to make use of fewer asset courses. For this cohort, there’s prone to be a concentrate on equities over fastened revenue. It’s cheap to imagine the chosen variety of asset courses would enhance for mid- and late-career cohorts as a result of diversification and danger mitigation are likely to change into extra valued.
• One other technique to observe funding proficiency is through the use of a scatter plot of participant fairness/fastened revenue allocation splits by age, in comparison with a pattern TDF allocation. The plan’s recordkeeper ought to be capable to present this data. If the scatter plot reveals huge dispersion from the pattern TDF allocation, it’s cheap to imagine funding proficiency is probably going low. A low diploma of funding proficiency can affect whether or not the funding construction designed for non-QDIA traders might be streamlined by excluding non-core asset courses, corresponding to commodities.

d. Draw back danger tolerance

Utilizing an analogous low-medium-high score system, gauge draw back danger tolerance of the biggest participant phase. Draw back danger tolerance is a crucial consider intentional funding construction design and QDIA choice.

To assist determine participant draw back danger tolerance, plan sponsors can:

• Evaluation recordkeeping reviews of transfers into and out of funding choices throughout calendar quarters instantly following a market downturn or massive loss in a particular asset class.
• If the business doesn’t require post-secondary schooling for many workers, draw back danger tolerance is comparatively low and most plan sponsors will eclude asset courses topic to extra frequent and important losses. Alternatively, if superior ranges of schooling are required, plan sponsors might need to assume a average to excessive degree of draw back danger tolerance.

e. Stability of workforce

If turnover and liquidations by laid-off workers are excessive, it’s cheap to imagine that the funding construction and any TDFs provided ought to lean towards a low draw back danger profile.

f. Presence of an outlined profit pension plan

Along with the DC plan, does the corporate additionally sponsor an outlined profit pension plan that it intends to maintain energetic with continued profit accruals? Does it present ample, focused substitute revenue to long-term workers? If sure, does the corporate view the DC plan as “supplemental”? On this occasion, it’s cheap to imagine that the funding construction of the DC plan could also be restricted to broad, core asset courses.

4. Evaluation the variety of asset class choices.

The variety of asset courses needs to be knowledgeable by the plan’s objective and aims assertion and participant group profile, quite than proactively setting an arbitrary restrict on the variety of asset courses. The latter motion might lead to plan sponsors overlooking the very best pursuits and desires of “do it myself” traders. As the preferred QDIA, TDFs permit much less engaged contributors, or these with decrease funding proficiency, to keep away from confusion or challenges in making asset allocation choices.

The typical variety of funding choices has declined as a result of contributors who’re much less comfy making knowledgeable funding choices now have larger entry to pre-diversified choices like TDFs or managed accounts. For reference, the common variety of funding choices (not asset courses) provided by plans is at present 21. The three highest ranges by respondents have been:

1. 1 to fifteen choices: 21.5%,
2. 16 to twenty choices: 26.2%
3. 26 or extra: 25.9% 

5. Keep away from sophisticated funding menu design.

If the participant group profile suggests a streamlined funding construction and variety of funding choices, hold the next factors in thoughts.

• A number of funding choices in the identical asset courses: Supply just one possibility per asset class except the choices include an energetic and passive implementation.
• World fairness and glued revenue: If the funding construction has separate home and worldwide asset courses, international asset courses might lead to unintended overlap.
• Sector, regional, and country-specific asset courses, excluding actual property funding trusts (REITs): These asset courses have larger danger publicity because of their extra particular or concentrated nature and different areas of the funding construction additionally probably have publicity to them. Remember that this may increasingly result in overlap and unintentional, massive allocations to particular areas of the market.
• Single-commodity asset courses: If commodities are acceptable for the plan’s funding construction, the diversification impact of together with a car with broad-based commodity publicity might assist mitigate the chance related to publicity to a single commodity, corresponding to gold, oil, or small teams of commodities like treasured metals.
• Goal danger: Goal danger funds, which preserve a hard and fast or restricted vary of fairness versus fastened revenue, are vulnerable to unintentional misuse by contributors who stay in the identical fund for longer than acceptable, quite than shifting to lower-risk, lower-equity allocation variations as their time horizons lower.
• Cash market and secure worth funds: Secure worth funds have traditionally outperformed cash market funds as a result of they will put money into intermediate-term bonds and preserve principal safety by wrap insurance coverage. Together with each cash market and secure worth funds can complicate participant asset motion as a result of cash market funds are deemed “competing funds” to secure worth. Secure worth funds don’t allow direct transfers to competing funds corresponding to cash market or different low-duration fastened revenue funds.

6.  Evaluation historic efficiency previous to asset class choice.

Evaluation historic efficiency for the final 10 years of all asset courses thought-about for lineup inclusion to determine asset courses which can be too unstable or topic to massive losses. This may assist the committee perceive their historic patterns and magnitude of good points and losses. Give attention to the biggest good points and largest losses for every asset class in the course of the 10-year interval. Evaluation the usual deviation for five- and 10-year intervals.

7. Replace the group’s funding coverage assertion to doc permissible asset courses.

Verify the DC plan’s Funding Coverage Assertion (IPS) to verify it expressly permits the specified asset courses. Amend the IPS, if wanted, earlier than making funding construction modifications to the plan menu.

Placing the Participant Group Profile into Apply

Listed below are two potential eventualities and the ensuing pattern funding buildings:

Participant Group A:

• Plan objective assertion: It is necessary that our DC plan helps the corporate’s aim of making a “retirement surroundings” tradition that promotes lengthy tenure of employment with frequent retirements from our firm, and for retirees to search out it enticing to retain their plan accounts all through retirement.
• Plan at present gives a managed account service.
• The “do it myself” traders signify 60% of contributors. The most important age cohort is ages 50-80, and contributors have a excessive degree of funding proficiency.
• Eighty % of retirees go away their account within the plan for the long run and take systematic withdrawals following retirement.
• The “do it for me” traders signify 40% of contributors. The most important age cohort is the 21-40-year vary, and contributors have a excessive degree of funding proficiency.
• The workforce is secure and never topic to periodic layoffs based mostly on financial cycles.
• The corporate doesn’t present an outlined profit pension plan along with the DC plan.

Urged asset courses:

• Home fairness
  • Massive cap: progress, core, and worth
• • Mid cap: progress, core, and worth
• • Small cap: progress, core, and worth
• Worldwide fairness
  • Massive cap: progress, core, and worth
• Mounted revenue
  • Treasury inflation-protected securities
• Worldwide fastened revenue
• Broad-based commodities
• Asset allocation (TDFs)

Participant Group B:

• Plan objective assertion: It is necessary that our DC plan displays the corporate’s aim of making a tradition that helps workers as they save and make investments for retirement. Our group tends to make use of predominantly early profession individuals. We count on and have traditionally skilled excessive worker turnover that ends in few, if any, retirements. When retirements happen, accounts are faraway from the plan shortly thereafter.
• Plan doesn’t at present supply a managed account service.
• The “do it myself” traders signify 20% of contributors. The most important age cohort is 40-45 years, and contributors have a average degree of funding proficiency.
• Plan gives a self-directed brokerage possibility, utilized by roughly half of the “do it myself” traders.
• The few contributors that stay within the plan previous age 65 have traditionally rolled over their accounts to particular person retirement accounts inside two years post-retirement.
• The “do it for me” traders signify 80% of contributors and there aren’t any age cohorts with a materially larger focus than others. Individuals are assumed to have a low degree of funding proficiency.
• The workforce is secure and never topic to periodic layoffs based mostly on financial cycles.
• The corporate doesn’t present an outlined profit pension plan along with the DC plan.

Urged asset courses:

• Home fairness
• Worldwide fairness
• Mounted revenue
• Worldwide fastened revenue
• Asset allocation (TDFs)

Empowering Plan Sponsors

Utilizing an knowledgeable, structured funding design course of will bolster DC plan sponsor confidence that funding lineup choice choices are tailor-made to the wants of most plan contributors. The funding menu design course of ought to allow the plan sponsor to really feel educated about how the group arrived at its plan’s funding construction and why, in addition to present the knowledge essential to doc a prudent decision-making course of, a key tenant of fiduciary responsibility underneath ERISA.

In case you favored this put up, don’t neglect to subscribe to Enterprising Investor and the CFA Institute Research and Policy Center.

All posts are the opinion of the writer(s). As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially mirror the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.

The fabric offered herein is of a common nature and doesn’t represent the supply by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any particular person, or a suggestion to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The knowledge contained herein was obtained from sources deemed dependable. Such data is just not assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The knowledge contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to alter with out discover.

PNC might present hyperlinks to different websites. Content material on such websites is offered solely for the consumer’s comfort. PNC makes no guarantee of any sort relating to that content material and linking to such content material doesn’t represent or point out sponsorship, endorsement or affiliation in any means.

The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising and marketing identify PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the varied discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated providers offered by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions performed by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation except, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax providers settlement. PNC Financial institution is just not registered as a municipal advisor underneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Avenue Reform and Client Safety Act.

“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc.

Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Might Lose Worth.

©2024 The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Might Lose Worth.

©2024 The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Picture credit score: ©Getty Photos / Rudenkoi

Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can document credit simply utilizing their online PL tracker.